Best Rorschach 2024 Andò, A., Ferraris, A., Inei, B., Ales, F., Berardo, G., Corgiat Loia, A., Pasqualini, S., Libero, P., Zennaro, A., & Giromini, L. Aschieri, F., Pascarella, G., Milesi, A., & Giromini, L. Porcelli, P., Giromini, L., & Zennaro, A. 2023 Giselle Pianowski, Anna Elisa de Villemor-Amaral, & Gregory J. Meyer 2022 Francesca Ales, Gregory J. Meyer, Joni L. Mihura, Andrea Corgiat Loia, Sara Pasqualini, Alessandro Zennaro, & Luciano Giromini 2021 Giselle Pianowski, Gregory J. Meyer, Anna Elisa de Villemor-Amaral, Ana Carolina Zuanazzi, & Regina Sonia Gattas F. do Nascimento 2020 Correspondence of maximum and typical performance measures of cognitive processing Daniel B. Charek, Gregory J. Meyer, Joni L. Mihura, and Emily T. O'Gorman The effects of coding the location of individual objects in a normative sample of Rorschach data Benjamin A. Berry and Gregory J. Meyer 2019 Complexity and cognitive engagement in the Rorschach task: An eye-tracking study Francesca Ales, Luciano Giromini, and Alessandro Zennaro 2018 Convergence between Rorschach and self-report: A new look at some old questions Leslie C. Morey & Morgan N. McCredie Agata Ando', Jaime A. Pineda, Luciano Giromini, Gregory Soghoyan, QunYang, Miranda Bohm, Daniel Maryanovsky, and Alessandro Zennaro
Best Rorschach Case or 2023 Corine de Ruiter,Luciano Giromini, Gregory J. Meyer, Chistopher M. King, & Benjamin A. Rubin 2022 Teresa Morales & Donald Viglione Tod Roy, Joni L. Mihura, Alan Friedman, David Nichols, & Reid Meloy 2021 Koji Jimura, Tomoki Asari, & Noriko Nakamura 2020 Implementation of the Rorschach in an evidence-based setting: A Sisyphean task?! Inge Van Laer, Maarten Vanhoyland, and Hilde De Saeger Fillippo Aschieri and Carlo Vetere 2019 Peder Chr Bryhn Nørbech |
We select articles following a PsycInfo and PubMed search of the literature to identify Rorschach studies published in the previous year. Subsequently, two of the authors and RAs identify promising articles by independently rating each one. Then the authors, RAs, and members of the R-PAS Research and Development Group read and rate the qualifying articles. Typically, the awards go to the highest rated article in each category, though at times articles are tied for the highest ratings. Articles that have an R-PAS author as the first author are not eligible for either award.